{"id":354,"date":"2007-12-19T11:00:15","date_gmt":"2007-12-19T15:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.flascience.org\/wp\/?p=354"},"modified":"2008-08-04T12:15:25","modified_gmt":"2008-08-04T16:15:25","slug":"misinformation-galore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=354","title":{"rendered":"Misinformation galore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.tallahassee.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20071219\/OPINION05\/712190360\/1006\/OPINION\">A &#8220;your views&#8221; piece<\/a> in the Tallahassee Democrat is a great example of how easily misinformation can be passed along to the general public. The man writes about supposed flaws in evolution research. The writer obviously has no idea what he is actually talking about, or else he&#8217;s purposely lying to the reading audience. He has done no research and presented no source material on which to base his assertions. It would be easy for anyone uncritically reading his garbage to think that the writer is knowledgeable and that he got in a few good zingers against those dumb evolutionists. The more likely scenario is that the writer merely parroted talking points he read in some Discovery Institute book.<\/p>\n<p>The majority of his piece is muddled fluff. The only two specific points he actually makes turn out to be anything but fact.<\/p>\n<p>First, he claims that the Cambrian Explosion is a problem for evolution. Supposedly, fossils of complex organisms appear fully formed with no record of anything preceding them. At least, that&#8217;s how the writer presents it. He&#8217;s wrong. Yes, the abundant fossils of the Cambrian and no discovered fossils before that time period was a puzzler for Darwin, but I&#8217;m sure his mind would be at ease with recent discoveries about life before the Cambrian. Have a look at this paper published in 2000: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/cgi\/content\/full\/97\/13\/6947\">Solution to Darwin&#8217;s dilemma: Discovery of the missing Precambrian record of life<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Measured by virtually any criterion one might propose, studies of Precambrian life have burst forth since the mid-1960s to culminate in recent years in discovery of the oldest fossils known, petrified cellular microbes nearly 3,500 million years old, more than three-quarters the age of the Earth. Precambrian paleobiology is thriving&#8212;the vast majority of all scientists who have ever investigated the early fossil record are alive and working today; new discoveries are being made at an ever quickening clip&#8212;progress set in motion by the few bold scientists who blazed this trail in the 1950s and 1960s, just as their course was charted by the Dawsons, Walcotts, and Sewards, the pioneering pathfinders of the field. And the collective legacy of all who have played a role dates to Darwin and the dilemma of the missing Precambrian fossil record he first posed. After more than a century of trial and error, of search and final discovery, those of us who wonder about life&#8217;s early history can be thankful that what was once &#8220;inexplicable&#8221; to Darwin is no longer so to us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And it&#8217;s important to understand that the &#8220;explosion&#8221; refers to a time period of about 30 million years, hardly a fast pop in time. Is there scientific controversy concerning the Cambrian explosion? Of course. But such debates have nothing to do with the veracity of evolution overall. For example, you and a friend might be standing in front of a big machine that is churning out widgets. You and the friend can argue about the inner workings of the machine, what makes it tick. But that doesn&#8217;t negate that fact that the machine is still producing widgets. Further reading can be found <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/evolution\/library\/03\/4\/l_034_02.html\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucmp.berkeley.edu\/cambrian\/camb.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Next, the writer moves on to the creationist standard whine about transitional fossils. He claims there are few, if any at all. The writer needs to stick with his day job, because a scientist he is not. There are transitional fossils. One that attracted a lot of attention in the news was a &#8220;fishapod,&#8221; the Tiktaalik.  See more examples <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/nova\/id\/transitional.html\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rtis.com\/nat\/user\/elsberry\/evobio\/evc\/argresp\/tranform.html\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkorigins.org\/indexcc\/CC\/CC200.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The writer asks:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span class=\"bodytext\"> How many scientific disciplines are still struggling with problems identified in the 19th century? If I&#8217;m not mistaken, evolutionary biology is the only one.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"bodytext\">Well, you are mistaken. You are the one stuck in the 19th century.<\/span> Do some research in reliable, authoritative source materials and you may learn a thing or two.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A &#8220;your views&#8221; piece in the Tallahassee Democrat is a great example of how easily misinformation can be passed along to the general public. The man writes about supposed flaws in evolution research. The writer obviously has no idea what &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=354\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pcZNLl-5I","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":597,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=597","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":0},"title":"Flossing leads to cavities, right?","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"June 2, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"When confronted by someone who loudly criticizes evolution and yet obviously has no actual knowledge of the subject, I try to demonstrate for the person how foolish he or she is looking. I typically use an example of a patient loudly criticizing his dentist. He rattles on and on about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Antiscience nonsense&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Antiscience nonsense","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?cat=21"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":639,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=639","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":1},"title":"Please correct the record","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"July 5, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"A persistent letter writer to the TCPalm looks to be having his way with his creationist fantasies in the newspaper. Have a look (bold highlight mine): Roger Hule recently wrote in answering mine and several other letters objecting to his support of evolution. The letter was long on rhetoric and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Antiscience nonsense&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Antiscience nonsense","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?cat=21"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1258,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=1258","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":2},"title":"Palm Beach Post&#8217;s evolution\/creationism back-n-forth","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"March 3, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Sigh. I wish I had time to spare. My teacher internship is dominating my life and not allowing me to partake in some of my personal pleasures, such as diving deep into any evolution\/creationism debate that pops up in the Sunshine State. There is a little war of words on\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1226,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=1226","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":3},"title":"Stick Science Winners!","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"September 19, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"It is my pleasure to announce the winners of the 2nd Annual Florida Citizens for Science Stick Science Cartoon Contest. First, I would like to thank our four judges for taking the time to carefully consider and rate each of our top ten entries. Our judges this year are: Genie\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=275","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":4},"title":"Fact or fiction?","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"September 6, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Daniel W. Jarvis writes a regular column for a Marco Island community newspaper. I stumbled across his most recent piece, which announces that he will be poking evolution with a stick in his next few columns and promoting intelligent design. This first column doesn't present much hope for the series\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Analysis\/Commentary&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Analysis\/Commentary","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?cat=4"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":914,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?p=914","url_meta":{"origin":354,"position":5},"title":"More opinions on Wise","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"February 23, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Florida Citizens for Science supporter Paul Cottle, who is a professor of physics at Florida State University, wrote a nice piece for the Florida Times-Union about state Senator Wise's possible intelligent design creationism bill. Wise's proposal does not represent the viewpoints of all Christians. Last year, Bishop Thomas Wenski of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;\"ID Creationism\" bills '09&quot;","block_context":{"text":"\"ID Creationism\" bills '09","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?cat=27"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}