I had written a Op Ed for one of the Florida Newspapers entitled “Do We Need Darwin” which they agreed to publish. However on Thursday last I recievd a e-mail from them stating that they wanted\u00c2\u00a0sole rights to the article and I was not allowed to republish all, or any part of the article. I had already done this and refused their terms. There was no time to submitt it to any other newspaper so rather than waste it I will post it for you.<\/p>\n
\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Do We Need Darwin<\/p>\n
February 12th<\/sup> 2012 is Darwin Day, the 203rd<\/sup> year anniversary of the naturalist Charles Robert Darwin. Darwin established that all species of life have descended, over time, from common ancestory and proposed the scientific theory of evolution, a branching pattern of life processes that he called natural selection. With compelling evidence and much trepidation, he published his theory for evolution in the 1859 book \u00e2\u20ac\u0153On the Origin of Species, arguably one of the most important books ever written. Its importance not only lies in the recognition that humans share an affinity with all other animals and in particular members of a primate species, but in the way that recognition can be of benefit to us all. Of course, many people still refuse to accept Darwin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s theory, or at least think it would be demeaning if it were true. To consider that man does not possess a divinely gifted domain in an anthropocentric universe would seem to ostensibly outweigh its vague benefits. Since its inception 200years ago, there has been a deluge of fervid writings and passionate debates, yet no other scientific theory remains as poorly understood or woefully unappreciated as evolution, particularly in the United States. In a recent survey on the public acceptance of Evolution conducted among thirty four western countries, America placed slightly ahead of Turkey at an embarrassing thirty third. Perhaps dismissing the noun, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153theory\u00e2\u20ac\u009d in front of evolution and call it the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fact of evolution\u00e2\u20ac\u009d would benefit those who consider the term theory to mean pure speculation rather than its true scientific definition. However, it is not my intention (at least not in this editorial) to extend this debate. So perhaps I can present evolution from a perspective that is rather less scientifically nuanced.<\/p>\n Conceivably you are reading this editorial one evening in the comfort of your home, you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve just eaten dinner, roast beef and several vegetables and your favorite dog is curled up on the floor next to you. Earlier in the day you felt a little under the weather, so, using your cell phone, made an appointment to see your doctor and then drove in your new vehicle to pay him or her a visit. You were prescribed anti biotics and received your yearly influenza shot at the same time.<\/p>\n On the way home you stopped by the gym in an effort to lose the extra 20 lbs you\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve inconceivably gained over the last few years and cannot imagine why.<\/p>\n The practical consequences (in evolutionary terms) of the last paragraph may not seem initially obvious, yet look a little deeper and we can appreciate the substantial influence that evolution places on our daily lives.<\/p>\n Your roast beef came from a ox\u00e2\u20ac\u201clike animal called an auroch, which roamed over large areas of Asia and North Africa and has been domesticated and selectively breed for the past eight to ten thousand years. The vegetables you enjoyed are hybrid plants never found in the wild and would not be able to survive (in the evolutionary sense) in the wild.<\/p>\n If your dog behaves a little aggressively once in a while, well that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s normal, all modern dogs have been genetically link to the Asian Grey Wolf which was first domesticated around 15,000 years ago. The scientific study of Biomimetics \u00e2\u20ac\u201c the application of evolved designs from nature to resolve problems in engineering and modern materials, account for the streamlining of your car and the iridescence and antireflective properties found in moth and butterfly eyes resulted in a brighter screen for your cell phone. Due to the rapid evolving resistances in bacteria and viruses, both your prescribed anti biotics and flu shot have to be updated every year by pharmaceutical researchers. And your over eating \/weight problem. In our distant past, living on the open savannahs, if we wanted to survive, natural selection required us to consume as much proteins and sugars that were available. Unfortunately that instinct is still with us.<\/p>\n It would seem that one of the downfalls of scientific modernity is to adopt a position of self assumption and our reliance on evolution is no exception. As a society we remain ambivalent toward the subject, not realizing that trying to equate Darwin with our modern day understanding of evolution is rather like associating the Wright Brothers to space flight.\u00c2\u00a0 If, as a nation, we wish to compete in a rapidly advancing technological world arena, we should take note of the advice offered by Darwin himself. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153It is neither the strongest that survive, nor the most intelligent, it is the ones that are most adaptable to change\u00e2\u20ac\u009d In America, the time for that change is long overdue.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I had written a Op Ed for one of the Florida Newspapers entitled “Do We Need Darwin” which they agreed to publish. However on Thursday last I recievd a e-mail from them stating that they wanted\u00c2\u00a0sole rights to the article … Continue reading