{"id":3114,"date":"2017-12-26T10:58:42","date_gmt":"2017-12-26T15:58:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.flascience.org\/wp\/?page_id=3114"},"modified":"2018-03-18T11:08:50","modified_gmt":"2018-03-18T15:08:50","slug":"constitution-revision-commission","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3114","title":{"rendered":"Constitution Revision Commission"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Note: please read to the bottom of this page. New updates are added there.)<\/em><\/p>\n

Every two decades a commission is charged with reviewing the Florida constitution and suggesting changes to it. I admit that I know very little about the process, so I will rely on you folks to educate me and guide all of us through the process. I do know that the commission has held public hearings and after some deliberations generated a list of proposed changes to the constitution. This Sun-Sentinel article lists the final 103 proposals<\/a>. There are quite a few items that target education. For instance, here’s a couple of proposals:<\/p>\n

4.\u00c2\u00a0Deleting language barring state funds from going to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153aid of any church, sect or religious denomination.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

59. Allowing the state to use taxpayer dollars to fund private, religious schools.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I wrote about that part of the state constitution in chapter eight of my book Going Ape<\/a>. When Jeb Bush was governor he made many significant changes to the education system. In 1999 he worked with the state legislature to create the Opportunity Scholarship Program, which was a voucher program that allowed students who attended consistently failing public schools to either transfer to a high-performing public school or use state funds to attend a participating private school. The program was quickly challenged because the majority of participating private school were religious.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>“Many of the parents bring their kids here because they want a Christian education,” the principal of a voucher-accepting private school told the Palm Beach Post<\/em> in 2005. “And a Christian education does not include evolution.”<\/p>\n

The ACLU and the National Education Association sued to have the\u00c2\u00a0Opportunity Scholarship Program stopped. They had several problems with the program, one of them being that public money going to private religious schools violated Article I, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution, which states “No revenue of the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof shall ever be taken from the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any church, sect, or religious denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution.”<\/p>\n

After several years, the final court decision was that the\u00c2\u00a0Opportunity Scholarship Program was in violation of the state constitution. The part of the constitution cited in the ruling, though, was one that requires the state to provide a “uniform, high quality education.” In other words, the private schools could use any curriculum they wanted and didn’t have to adhere to any particular education standards, which doesn’t live up to the constitution’s mandate of “uniform” education. Lower court rulings did say the program violated the “aid to sectarian institution” prohibition but the Florida Supreme Court didn’t offer any opinion on that matter, instead focusing on the “quality education” argument. Thus, that program was finally killed.<\/p>\n

But there are many other education-related proposals on the commission’s list, such as this:<\/p>\n

45. Changing the wording of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153public education\u00e2\u20ac\u009d section of the constitution from requiring a system of free public schools that \u00e2\u20ac\u0153allows students to obtain a high quality education\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to one that allows \u00e2\u20ac\u0153for the opportunity for each student to obtain a high quality education.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Also lays out that nothing in this section prevents the Legislature from creating other educational opportunities in addition to free public schools.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Florida does currently have other voucher programs, but not ones that were so wide open as the\u00c2\u00a0Opportunity Scholarship Program was. It’s obvious, though, that there is a determined effort to return to the good ol’ days of vouchers for everyone. Will the\u00c2\u00a0Constitution Revision Commission’s proposals be a step in that direction?<\/p>\n

There are other education-related items on the commission’s list:<\/p>\n

10. Requiring civic literacy to be taught in schools.
\n25. Creating a 17-member board of directors for the state college system, which will oversee all community colleges and state colleges, but not universities.
\n32. Taking away any compensation except travel and per diem expenses from members of the state board of education, school boards, university boards of trustees and the university system\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s board of governors.
\n33. Ending election of school superintendents and making all of them appointed by county school boards.
\n43. Preventing people from running for school board if they have been on the board for the previous eight consecutive years.
\n44. Requiring the vote of nine members of a university board of trustees and 12 members of the university system\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s board of governors to increase fees or tuition at a university.
\n71. Adding to the section on school boards in the constitution that nothing within the section limits the Florida Legislature\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s ability to create alternatives to school boards for the establishment of charter schools.
\n82. Preventing school boards from setting the opening day of school more than a week before Labor Day.
\n83. Creating a State College System under the Florida Board of Education.
\n89. Stating that \u00e2\u20ac\u0153it is the intent of the people to provide high quality and affordable postsecondary education opportunities.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\n90. Changing the maximum class size for a public school of 22 to an average class size of 22 within the school. Additionally, any funds leftover from those appropriated to maintain class size would go toward increasing teacher pay to the national average.
\n93. Allowing a school board, by a vote of the board or county voters, to turn a school district into a charter school district that is exempt from the same rules and regulations as a charter school.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If you want to track any of the proposals, go to the Constitution Revision Commission website at www.flcrc.gov<\/a>. And I encourage anyone who knows more about this revision process than I to please volunteer to be our guide. It will be sincerely appreciated.<\/p>\n

Update 1:<\/h3>\n

Some Florida Citizens for Science members and friends traveled to Tallahassee Nov 29 to testify against the proposed change to our state constitution that would “remove the prohibition against using public revenues in aid of any church, sect, or religious denomination or any sectarian institution.” Jiri Hulcr and Joseph Richardson sent this report of their experience, reprinted with permission:<\/p>\n

Joseph Richardson and I have just come back from a meeting of the Constitution Revision Commission in Tallahassee. The main topic of today\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s agenda was whether to place on a public voting ballot the proposal to delete the No Aid clause of the Florida Constitution that bans the State from supporting religious organizations with tax-revenue money.<\/p>\n

It was one of the most troubling experiences in my recent memory. I believe that we have witnessed the right-wing political machine at work. It was obvious that the decisions of the individual committee members have been made long before the meeting. Many of the commissioners are politically appointed by governor Scott, others are drawn from other branches of the current government, and as a result this critically important body is much more a reflection of the current conservative representatives than of the state\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s population. There were only four members of the public that spoke: three against the proposal, one (a representative of a catholic bishop conference) in support. The proposal passed 7 to 1 [the website says the vote was 5-1], quickly, with little discussion among the committee members. The Florida voters will soon be asked to decide whether to get rid of one of the few remaining pieces in the state legislature that prevent religious organizations pushing religious agenda, particularly education, using your taxes.<\/p>\n

The most troubling aspect was the behavior of some of the committee members. There was not even a pretext of unbiased and prudent deliberation. Commissioner Stemberger in particular was wallowing in excitement as he proceeded to lecture about the benefits of connecting, not separating, church and state. […] Here are a few transcribed gems: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153By getting rid of [the No Aid clause] we are getting more human flourishing, better education\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 Faith is a public good. Faith provides amazing richness and services. [\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6] It is smart for the government to decentralize its services\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6 The purpose of the First Amendment was NOT to protect non-religious people from religion\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6. Our job [as the Committee] is not to be successful, it is to be faithful.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

Is this legal? Is this the appropriate process? Can the committee\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s explicit, blatant bias be challenged on this ground?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If you’re interested in watching the comments, the video is available online<\/a>. Jiri starts at about 1:55:00 and Joseph immediately follows him.<\/p>\n

Here’s a news article about the vote:\u00c2\u00a0Panel wants end of Florida constitution ban on state cash for religion<\/a><\/p>\n

The Constitution Revision Commission meets every 20 years and has the power to place proposed constitutional amendments on the November 2018 ballot. Martinez\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s proposal to eliminate the no-aid provision is one of dozens of proposals being considered by the commission.<\/p>\n

Adkins warned commission members that adding a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153controversial\u00e2\u20ac\u009d provision like the no-aid proposal could jeopardize the commission\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s entire slate of measures. She noted a similar no-aid constitutional amendment failed in 2012 with only 44.5 percent support from voters.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Martinez\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s proposal next heads to the commission\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Education Committee. If it moves forward to the full 37-member commission, it will need at least 22 votes to go before voters in November 2018.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Florida Citizens for Science member and Gainesville resident Jiri Hulcr had an opinion piece published in the Gainesville Sun about her experience speaking in front of the Florida Constitution Revision Commission. She was there to oppose the proposal to allow public money to fund religious organizations (such as voucher schools that teach creationism instead of evolution).\u00c2\u00a0Don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t use taxpayer money to fund religious organizations<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The meeting was eye-opening. What I witnessed was not prudent and unbiased deliberation, but a show scripted for public consumption. Several commissioners did not even pretend to represent the people, and instead were justifying a clear agenda. Commissioner John Stemberger, for example, was beaming with excitement as he proceeded to lecture about the benefits of connecting, not separating, church and state.<\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Faith is a public good … Our job [as the commission] is not to be successful, it is to be faithful,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Stemberger said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Update 2:<\/h3>\n

Please read this blog post about public hearings that we’re encouraging you to attend:\u00c2\u00a0Constitution Revision Commission Update<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Update 3:<\/h3>\n

Please read this blog post about a new proposition that further endangers public education:\u00c2\u00a0Constitution Revision Commission Update II<\/a>. From that blog post:<\/p>\n

As if Proposition 4 (which deletes the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153No Aid\u00e2\u20ac\u009d to religious institutions clause) wasn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t enough reason to communicate with the members of the commission we have Proposition 45. The obvious intent is to open a door for state funding of private schools if the legislature deems them to be for, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153other educational services that benefit the children and families of this state that are in addition to the system of free public schools.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d When combined with Proposition 4, virtually all limits at the state level to taxpayer dollars flowing to support private schools with anti-science agendas will be gone.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Update 4:<\/h3>\n

Please read this blog post about the end of the public hearings and the work the commission has remaining before the issues go before the voters:\u00c2\u00a0Constitution Revision Commission Update III<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Note: please read to the bottom of this page. New updates are added there.) Every two decades a commission is charged with reviewing the Florida constitution and suggesting changes to it. I admit that I know very little about the … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":3069,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/PcZNLl-Oe","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3069,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3069","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":0},"title":"Issues","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"December 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Current Issues (2017 & 2018) Florida Citizens for Science is facing an unprecedented year full of attacks on science education in 2018. Each of the links below goes to a page with details about each issue. You can also access each issue's page through the drop down menu at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.flascience.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Take-Action-2-300x212-300x212.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3100,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3100","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":1},"title":"Religious Expression in Schools Law","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"December 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Background: The Florida legislature presented Governor Rick Scott with the Religious Expression in Public Schools bill in June 2017 and he quickly signed it into law.\u00c2\u00a0There are two sections of the bill\u00c2\u00a0(link to pdf) that concern us here at Florida Citizens for Science. One of them is: A school district\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3087,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3087","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":2},"title":"Textbook Challenges Bill 2018","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"December 24, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Final Status: Both bills died at the end of session. Overview: Florida's House Bill 827 and Senate Bill 1644 would, if enacted, revise the procedures for adopting instructional materials to permit members of the public to recommend instructional materials for consideration by the state or their district school board, which\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3105,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3105","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":3},"title":"New Instructional Materials for Science 2018","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"December 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The Florida Department of Education issued a \"Call for Reviewers Invitation for Science\" back in August 2017 in preparation for the review and adoption of new science instructional materials in 2018. Every year the FDOE reviews and approves a list of recommended textbooks for that year's academic subject. The previous\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3109,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3109","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":4},"title":"Poor Performance on State Science Tests","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"December 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"There are three science exams that all public school students in Florida must take: the statewide science assessments in grades 5 and 8 and the high school biology end of course exam. Students have to score a level three or higher on a five point scale to pass. The 5th\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.flascience.org\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/06\/It-feels-good-to-be-loud-300x200.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3398,"url":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/?page_id=3398","url_meta":{"origin":3114,"position":5},"title":"\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Controversial Theories\/Rigorous Standards\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Bills 2019","author":"Brandon Haught","date":"January 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Latest Update: Jan. 25: Senate bill referred to four committees. Overview: A bill was filed for the 2019 legislative session in the Florida legislature that would impact the standards for all academic subjects, especially science. The bill proposes allowing school districts to adopt their own sets of educational standards if\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3114"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3114"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3260,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3114\/revisions\/3260"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3069"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.flascience.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}