Why should we not be surprised to see the (first of many) criticisms of the new National Science Standards? Number one to jump on the band wagon, our old friend Casey Luskin at the Discovery Institute who calls the inclusion of evolution, “dogmatic and inaccurate“. He also throws out the old “critical thinking” canard. Quoting Jonathan Osbourne, Luskin suggests students should learn about evidence that does not support any scientific theory, including evolution. I agree. Now let’s see Luskin produce that non-supporting evidence which disproves evolution.
Hat tip to Paul Cottle