Evolution is scientific study when it allows consideration of opposing views.

Science does allow consideration of opposing views, when these views have merit. However, there is currently no alternate theory to evolution that holds any merit.

When the so-called-scientists that espouse it refuse to consider any other interpretation of the data other than the interpretation that supports their ideological viewpoint then it is no longer science…

Please name one alternate hypothesis.

I agree that lies and, I may add, other such scientifically unfounded ideas and preposterous fantasy world concepts, like human caused global warming, should not be imposed upon the vulnerable minds of children. It’s a political movement.

Is it a lie or is it imagination? That is what we have to choose from when considering the profound assumption man has a common ancestor with the apes. Regardless of DNA similarities claimed between apes and humans you’ll find swine parts are more compatible with the human body for medical purposes.

So back to my original concern for your faith. You and the other believers who trust the sacred writings of the Prophet and the never seen portions of evolutionary doctrine need to wake up. If you do not recognize this lie or imagination as a religion it will at some point be completely discarded as a bunch of crap.

It’s time to be a man a admit it was Darwin who had claimed his imaginations had become a religion. You should consider Church membership.

My BS meter has no problem sensing the BS from these people: Tim, Pastor Bill and Darwin Youth. Plus an honorable mention to Christensen for ignorance.

Tim, you lie when you mis-characterize science “as much of a religious belief as ID”.

Pastor Bill, you lie when you mis-characterize Charles Darwin as a prophet (and pretty much everything you say).

Darwin Youth, you even lie in your own name! But you lie mostly when you take quotes out of context.

Christensen, you don’t have a clue. Please buy a vowel.

You are all a bunch of liars and you do not have a say in what should be considered part of the scientific curriculum for science classes. You are vicious attackers of science and need to be verbally slapped down.

In reference to your post about ignorance, it would appear you aren’t familiar with the basic faith which propels the followers of the Prophet Charles Darwin. As Charles Darwin is revered as the prophet of the deity Natural Selection, it is well known that his preparation came from the believers which preceded him. One of those who helped lay the foundation of imagination was his grandfather Erasmus Darwin who wrote, “Would it be too bold to imagine that all warm blooded animals have arisen from one living filament?”

You do error in implicating ID or creationist, which have nothing to do with the Prophets message and the great commission of transitional fabrication through imagination.

Neither does the falsifiable theory of evolution have anything to do with the religious observations of the disciples of the First Church of Evolution who by faith and imagination believe transitions can be seen.